perm filename PRESR2[RST,LCS] blob
sn#236438 filedate 1976-09-15 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ā VALID 00002 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002 Department of Music
C00008 ENDMK
Cā;
Department of Music
Stanford University
Stanford, CA. 94305
Arnold Broido, President Semptember 15, 1976
Theodore Presser Company
Presser Place
Bryn Mawr, PA.
Dear Mr. Broido,
I am very glad that you found my music printing system to be interesting.
Mr. Bernard Kalban, of Marks Music Corp. has written me requesting copies of the
material you showed to him. I have sent these things off to him today.
To give you some idea of time requirments I have run a fairly typical
example of piano music. The first sheet shows the printed output and the second
shows everything the operator must type to produce the first version of the music.
The second step, the editing and adding of other items, involves quite a bit less
typing. Here the time is spent in making the fine adjustment of the curvature
of slurs and the exact positioning of things such as the "8va". I am always in
the process of adding more possibilities to the automatic features. For example
there is no reason why the "8va" can't be placed automatically. The structure of
the program is such that new features can be added fairly easily.
You asked about the skill needed to operate this system. Several Stanford
music students have learned to use it. Many extensive pieces have been produced.
I have never found it necessary to give more than two or three hours of instruction.
Students who have done a bit of music copying and are adequate typists develop a
good working skill after just a few sessions. I am in the process of writing a
self-teaching method for the system which will utilize the computer's capability
as a teaching aid. When this is done very little personal instruction will be
needed.
When this is turned into a production system it will probably be best to
have a group of semi-skilled operators (4 to 6 on a mini-computer system) typing
in the basic data (as seen on the second sheet of my example.) These operators
need have no more background than the average 1st year college music student.
Then there would be one or two editors who would plan page layouts before giving
the material to the operators and who would also do the editing for the final copy.
As things stand right now it only takes about 10 minutes to change, say a five
page layout to a six page one. However I plan to develop a special system for
this which should make it possible to try out several different layouts in a
just a few minutes.
While I believe my process can successfully compete with other methods
in "ordinary" piano and vocal music, where it will save the most time is in the
field of orchestral and ensemble music. Orchestra scores can be prepared in an
average of less than 5 minutes a staff line. However the players parts can then
be produced in 5 to 10 minutes per page. All standard transpositions, Bb, A, F
and Eb are automatic. It is quite simple to produce alternate parts for Trumpet
in C or Bb, or Clarinet in A or Bb, etc. Given the nature of computerized systems
it is reasonable to expect that this process will continue to become easier and
faster to use and more and more flexible.
Very sincerely,
Leland Smith
Professor of Music